Compare

Four ways to get an agent the knowledge it needs.

Three of them already work. We think ours is better, and this page says plainly where it is not.

liveone credit per questionsettles in USDC
The comparison

Inflectiv compared with search APIs, licensed corpora, and building your own

Three of them already work. The real questions are what your data is still worth a year after you buy it, and whether whoever did the work ever gets paid again.

What you get

Search APIs for agents

Whatever was already free on the open web.

A licensed corpus

One deep corpus, checked by people.

Roll your own

Exactly what you loaded, and nothing more.

Inflectiv

A dataset somebody else keeps current, that your agent can also write to.

Who keeps it current

Search APIs for agents

Nobody. The crawler moves on.

A licensed corpus

The vendor, until you buy the next licence.

Roll your own

You, forever.

Inflectiv

The owner, who is paid every time it is asked.

What the source earns

Search APIs for agents

Nothing.

A licensed corpus

One payment, at signature.

Roll your own

You are the source.

Inflectiv

A share of every question, for as long as it keeps being asked.

A year later

Search APIs for agents

The same web, crawled again.

A licensed corpus

A year out of date.

Roll your own

As current as the time you put into it.

Inflectiv

It answers more than it did, because the agents using it left it better.

Private or permissioned data

Search APIs for agents

It cannot carry any.

A licensed corpus

Only what was licensed.

Roll your own

Yours, if you host it yourself.

Inflectiv

Encrypted with Seal, and you set on chain who may query it.

Being honest about it

Where the other three are genuinely better

A comparison table that finds in our favour on every row is not a comparison. These are the cases where one of the other three is the right answer.

If your question is about something published this morning on a site nobody has structured, a live crawl beats us. We hold curated datasets, not an index of everything.

One of them took twenty-five years and a lot of human hands to cover a hundred jurisdictions, and it is very good. Our bet is that agents writing back can build the next one without the years or the headcount.

Your infrastructure, your embeddings, your rules. What it also gives you is the maintenance, permanently, for a corpus only you can use and only you pay for.

Everyone serious returns sources now. What is ours is where the citation points: at a record in a dataset whose owner is paid for it, and which gets better the more it is cited.

Worth being clear about

Citations are parity now, not a differentiator

Everyone serious returns sources. What is ours is where the citation points: at a record in a dataset whose owner is paid for it, and which gets better the more it is cited.

The question is what it is worth a year from now.

Every option here answers a question today. Only one of them answers more next year than it does this morning, because the agents using it left it better.